The Commissioner City Municipal Council Harihara vs M/s Abhiram infra projects projects pvt ltd — 6/2020

Case under The Arbitration and Concilliation Act Section 34. Status: FURTHER ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Com.A.S. - Commercial A S

CNR: KADG010015492020

FURTHER ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

6/2020

Filing Date

30-06-2020

Registration No

6/2020

Registration Date

30-06-2020

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Acts & Sections

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILLIATION ACT Section 34

Petitioner(s)

The Commissioner City Municipal Council Harihara

Adv. RUDRABHUSHAN C B

Respondent(s)

M/s Abhiram infra projects projects pvt ltd

Hearing History

Judge: 243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

21-04-2026

FURTHER ARGUMENTS

18-04-2026

FURTHER ARGUMENTS

13-03-2026

FURTHER ARGUMENTS

25-02-2026

FURTHER ARGUMENTS

07-02-2026

FURTHER ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

01-07-2020
Orders

Case 6/2020 Summary: The court granted a status-quo order on three bank guarantees (totaling Rs. 1,34,12,457) issued by defendant M/s Abhiram Infra Projects Pvt Ltd in favor of the City Municipal Council Harihara. Both parties are prohibited from withdrawing or encashing the guarantees until the next hearing on 16-7-2020. The order was passed because the plaintiff challenged an arbitral tribunal's award directing it to pay Rs. 1,36,21,043 to the defendant, and the court found that allowing withdrawal of the guarantees would adversely affect public funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 6/2020 Summary: The court granted a status-quo order on three bank guarantees (totaling Rs. 1,34,12,457) issued by defendant M/s Abhiram Infra Projects Pvt Ltd in favor of the City Municipal Council Harihara. Both parties are prohibited from withdrawing or encashing the guarantees until the next hearing on 16-7-2020. The order was passed because the plaintiff challenged an arbitral tribunal's award directing it to pay Rs. 1,36,21,043 to the defendant, and the court found that allowing withdrawal of the guarantees would adversely affect public funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case