Rakesh Kumar vs Girish S.K. — 125/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415(3). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th April 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL MISC APPEAL CASES
CNR: KADG010015232025
Filing Number
125/2025
Filing Date
20-05-2025
Registration No
125/2025
Registration Date
20-05-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rakesh Kumar
Adv. CHANDRASHEKAR T H
Respondent(s)
Girish S.K.
Hearing History
Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Criminal Appeal 125/2025 - Rakesh Kumar v. Girish S.K. The appellate court dismissed Rakesh Kumar's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Kumar was ordered to pay a fine of ₹12 lakhs for dishonoring a ₹10 lakh cheque issued to complainant Girish S.K. The court found Kumar failed to rebut the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable debt, rejecting his defenses regarding non-transaction, bank endorsement technicalities, and the complainant's financial capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Criminal Appeal 125/2025 - Rakesh Kumar v. Girish S.K. The appellate court dismissed Rakesh Kumar's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Kumar was ordered to pay a fine of ₹12 lakhs for dishonoring a ₹10 lakh cheque issued to complainant Girish S.K. The court found Kumar failed to rebut the statutory presumption of a legally enforceable debt, rejecting his defenses regarding non-transaction, bank endorsement technicalities, and the complainant's financial capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts