C Somashekharappa vs The Manager- The Wind World India Ltd., — 96/2018
Case under Indian Teligraph Act Section 16(3). Status: FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KADG010013332018
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
Filing Number
96/2018
Filing Date
13-03-2018
Registration No
96/2018
Registration Date
13-03-2018
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
C Somashekharappa
Adv. MADHU N R
Respondent(s)
The Manager- The Wind World India Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
| 28-02-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
| 13-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-01-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Misc.96/2018 Petitioner: C Somashekharappa Respondent: The Manager, The Wind World India Ltd. The court dismissed the petitioner's plea seeking compensation for alleged damages to his agricultural land caused by the installation of an electrical transmission line. The petitioner claimed loss of land value and sought relief under the claim that proper permissions were not obtained and correct procedures were not followed during the line installation. The court found the petitioner's allegations unsubstantiated and rejected his contentions regarding document authenticity, compensation claims, and assertions of improper conduct by the respondent company. The petition was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Misc.96/2018 Petitioner: C Somashekharappa Respondent: The Manager, The Wind World India Ltd. The court dismissed the petitioner's plea seeking compensation for alleged damages to his agricultural land caused by the installation of an electrical transmission line. The petitioner claimed loss of land value and sought relief under the claim that proper permissions were not obtained and correct procedures were not followed during the line installation. The court found the petitioner's allegations unsubstantiated and rejected his contentions regarding document authenticity, compensation claims, and assertions of improper conduct by the respondent company. The petition was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts