K Govindappa vs The Manager- The Wind World India Ltd., — 58/2018
Case under Indian Teligraph Act Section 16(3). Status: FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KADG010011382018
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
Filing Number
58/2018
Filing Date
21-02-2018
Registration No
58/2018
Registration Date
21-02-2018
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K Govindappa
Adv. MADHU N R
Respondent(s)
The Manager- The Wind World India Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
| 28-02-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
| 13-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-01-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Misc.58/2018 Case: K Govindappa v. The Manager, Wind World India Ltd. Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding alleged defects in documentation and compensation for land affected by a 220 kV electrical transmission line. The court found the respondent's testimony credible and determined that proper procedures were followed for line survey (2014-15), line construction (2016-17), and compensation payment of ₹1,50,000. The court rejected allegations that documents were fabricated or that compensation was inadequate, finding no merit in the petitioner's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Misc.58/2018 Case: K Govindappa v. The Manager, Wind World India Ltd. Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding alleged defects in documentation and compensation for land affected by a 220 kV electrical transmission line. The court found the respondent's testimony credible and determined that proper procedures were followed for line survey (2014-15), line construction (2016-17), and compensation payment of ₹1,50,000. The court rejected allegations that documents were fabricated or that compensation was inadequate, finding no merit in the petitioner's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts