Girish vs Soumyashree — 28/2022

Case under U/s 397 of Cr.pc Section 397. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION

CNR: KADG010010982022

OBJECTION

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

28/2022

Filing Date

15-03-2022

Registration No

28/2022

Registration Date

15-03-2022

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

889-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Acts & Sections

U/S 397 OF CR.PC Section 397

Petitioner(s)

Girish

Adv. K G Vasanth

Respondent(s)

Soumyashree

Hearing History

Judge: 889-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

25-04-2026

OBJECTION

04-04-2026

OBJECTION

13-03-2026

FURTHER ARGUMENTS

12-03-2026

FURTHER ARGUMENTS

28-02-2026

FURTHER ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

13-08-2025
Deposition
08-09-2025
Deposition
23-09-2025
Deposition

This court order from the Criminal Revision Petition in Case 28/2022 (Girish v. Soumyashree) addresses witness testimony and evidence presentation. On September 23, 2025, a witness (PW-1) was re-examined and sworn in. The court found that the petitioner (Girish) made false accusations against the witness, claiming perjury and improper evidence presentation. The court determined these allegations were factually incorrect and that the witness testimony was consistent with prior statements. The petition appears to have been dismissed or rejected based on the court's findings that the petitioner's claims lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This court order from the Criminal Revision Petition in Case 28/2022 (Girish v. Soumyashree) addresses witness testimony and evidence presentation. On September 23, 2025, a witness (PW-1) was re-examined and sworn in. The court found that the petitioner (Girish) made false accusations against the witness, claiming perjury and improper evidence presentation. The court determined these allegations were factually incorrect and that the witness testimony was consistent with prior statements. The petition appears to have been dismissed or rejected based on the court's findings that the petitioner's claims lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case