K Shivamma vs The Deputy Commissioner and Arbitrator, Davanagere — 4/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th March 2026.
A.P - Arbitration Petition
CNR: KADG010010752025
Filing Number
4/2025
Filing Date
27-03-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
27-03-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K Shivamma
Adv. SHANKAR RAO M
B Veema Reddy
Respondent(s)
The Deputy Commissioner and Arbitrator, Davanagere
The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Chitradurga
The National Highway Authority of India, R/by Project Director, Chitradurga
Hearing History
Judge: 243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
FURTHER ARGUMENTS
FURTHER ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 18-03-2026 | FURTHER ARGUMENTS |
| 17-03-2026 | FURTHER ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: K Shivamma and B Veema Reddy vs. The Deputy Commissioner and Arbitrator, Davanagere The court allowed the petitioners' challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, setting aside an arbitrator's award denying higher compensation for land acquired for National Highway widening. The court found the arbitrator ignored vital documents regarding special government guidelines for valuing non-agricultural commercial land without specific Sub-Registrar rates, constituting patent illegality. The matter was remanded for reconsideration applying RFCTLARR Act 2013 and NH Act guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: K Shivamma and B Veema Reddy vs. The Deputy Commissioner and Arbitrator, Davanagere The court allowed the petitioners' challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, setting aside an arbitrator's award denying higher compensation for land acquired for National Highway widening. The court found the arbitrator ignored vital documents regarding special government guidelines for valuing non-agricultural commercial land without specific Sub-Registrar rates, constituting patent illegality. The matter was remanded for reconsideration applying RFCTLARR Act 2013 and NH Act guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts