Kumar vs State by Davanagere Rural PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 76/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 01st April 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL MISC APPEAL CASES
CNR: KADG010010562025
Filing Number
76/2025
Filing Date
25-03-2025
Registration No
76/2025
Registration Date
25-03-2025
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
DAVANGERE RURAL PS
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kumar
Adv. Rajesh S Varnekar
Ramesh alias Ramesh Kumar
Maruti P
Suresh S
Respondent(s)
State by Davanagere Rural PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 18-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 76/2025 The Principal District and Sessions Judge Davanagere acquitted all four appellants (Kumar, Ramesh Kumar, Maruti P, and Suresh) of charges under IPC Sections 448, 323, 324, 504, 506 (read with Section 34), finding major contradictions in prosecution evidence regarding their presence and intent. The appellate court identified critical flaws: the alleged principal accused's wife (PW.4) stated he was absent on the incident date, independent witnesses turned hostile, medical evidence didn't correlate with the seizure report, and the underlying matrimonial dispute (with a partition suit pending) suggested family conflict rather than criminal intent. The court also noted procedural irregularities in the trial court's sentencing process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 76/2025 The Principal District and Sessions Judge Davanagere acquitted all four appellants (Kumar, Ramesh Kumar, Maruti P, and Suresh) of charges under IPC Sections 448, 323, 324, 504, 506 (read with Section 34), finding major contradictions in prosecution evidence regarding their presence and intent. The appellate court identified critical flaws: the alleged principal accused's wife (PW.4) stated he was absent on the incident date, independent witnesses turned hostile, medical evidence didn't correlate with the seizure report, and the underlying matrimonial dispute (with a partition suit pending) suggested family conflict rather than criminal intent. The court also noted procedural irregularities in the trial court's sentencing process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts