Kumar vs State by Davanagere Rural PS Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 76/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 01st April 2026.

CRL.A - CRIMINAL MISC APPEAL CASES

CNR: KADG010010562025

Case disposed

Filing Number

76/2025

Filing Date

25-03-2025

Registration No

76/2025

Registration Date

25-03-2025

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

134

Police Station

DAVANGERE RURAL PS

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 374(2)

Petitioner(s)

Kumar

Adv. Rajesh S Varnekar

Ramesh alias Ramesh Kumar

Maruti P

Suresh S

Respondent(s)

State by Davanagere Rural PS (Police Station) Advocate - Public Prosecutor

Hearing History

Judge: 243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

01-04-2026

Disposed

28-03-2026

JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL

27-03-2026

JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL

25-03-2026

JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL

18-03-2026

JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Judgment

Summary of Case 76/2025 The Principal District and Sessions Judge Davanagere acquitted all four appellants (Kumar, Ramesh Kumar, Maruti P, and Suresh) of charges under IPC Sections 448, 323, 324, 504, 506 (read with Section 34), finding major contradictions in prosecution evidence regarding their presence and intent. The appellate court identified critical flaws: the alleged principal accused's wife (PW.4) stated he was absent on the incident date, independent witnesses turned hostile, medical evidence didn't correlate with the seizure report, and the underlying matrimonial dispute (with a partition suit pending) suggested family conflict rather than criminal intent. The court also noted procedural irregularities in the trial court's sentencing process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 76/2025 The Principal District and Sessions Judge Davanagere acquitted all four appellants (Kumar, Ramesh Kumar, Maruti P, and Suresh) of charges under IPC Sections 448, 323, 324, 504, 506 (read with Section 34), finding major contradictions in prosecution evidence regarding their presence and intent. The appellate court identified critical flaws: the alleged principal accused's wife (PW.4) stated he was absent on the incident date, independent witnesses turned hostile, medical evidence didn't correlate with the seizure report, and the underlying matrimonial dispute (with a partition suit pending) suggested family conflict rather than criminal intent. The court also noted procedural irregularities in the trial court's sentencing process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case