Nagaraj vs State by Davangere Rural PS — 230/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 26th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KADG010009042026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

231/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

230/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

889-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

37

Police Station

DAVANGERE RURAL PS

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Nagaraj

Adv. HALAGERA CHANDRAPPA

Respondent(s)

State by Davangere Rural PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 889-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

26-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

ORDERS CRIMINAL

17-03-2026

OBJECTION

13-03-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.230/2026 Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Nagaraja (Accused No.2) in a theft case involving Rs.40,000 cash and an LG TV stolen from an agro agency shop on 29/01/2015. The court found the offences under IPC Sections 380 and 457 (non-bailable but not capital) did not warrant custody, given the petitioner's permanent residence, clean criminal record, and willingness to comply with conditions. Conditions: Bail set at Rs.50,000 personal bond with one surety of equal amount; petitioner must appear before trial court within 15 days, not tamper with prosecution witnesses, and attend all hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc.230/2026 Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Nagaraja (Accused No.2) in a theft case involving Rs.40,000 cash and an LG TV stolen from an agro agency shop on 29/01/2015. The court found the offences under IPC Sections 380 and 457 (non-bailable but not capital) did not warrant custody, given the petitioner's permanent residence, clean criminal record, and willingness to comply with conditions. Conditions: Bail set at Rs.50,000 personal bond with one surety of equal amount; petitioner must appear before trial court within 15 days, not tamper with prosecution witnesses, and attend all hearing dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case