Avinash vs State by Gandhinagar PS — 229/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 26th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADG010009032026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
230/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
229/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
243-Prl District And Sessions Judge Davangere
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
114
Police Station
GANDHINAGAR PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Avinash
Adv. HALAGERA CHANDRAPPA
-
2.Venkatesh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State by Gandhinagar PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: 229/2026 Court Decision: The District and Sessions Judge, Davangere, GRANTED anticipatory bail to Avinash and Venkatesh in Crime No. 114/2024 involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 3(5), 352, and 118(1) (assault and criminal intimidation arising from an October 2024 bar brawl). The court held that despite the charge sheet being filed, anticipatory bail could be granted since the offences are non-capital, the accused are permanent residents with property ties, custodial interrogation is unnecessary post-investigation, and stringent conditions can prevent trial interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl District And Sessions Judge Davangere
-
23-Mar-2026
Orders Criminal
Prl District And Sessions Judge Davangere
-
17-Mar-2026
Objection
Prl District And Sessions Judge Davangere
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 229/2026
Case Summary: 229/2026 Court Decision: The District and Sessions Judge, Davangere, GRANTED anticipatory bail to Avinash and Venkatesh in Crime No. 114/2024 involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 3(5), 352, and 118(1) (assault and criminal intimidation arising from an October 2024 bar brawl). The court held that despite the charge sheet being filed, anticipatory bail could be granted since the offences are non-capital, the accused are permanent residents with property ties, custodial interrogation is unnecessary post-investigation, and stringent conditions can prevent trial interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts