Avinash vs State by Gandhinagar PS — 229/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 26th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADG010009032026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
230/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
229/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
114
Police Station
GANDHINAGAR PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Avinash
Adv. HALAGERA CHANDRAPPA
Venkatesh
Respondent(s)
State by Gandhinagar PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
ORDERS CRIMINAL
OBJECTION
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 17-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 13-03-2026 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 229/2026 Court Decision: The District and Sessions Judge, Davangere, GRANTED anticipatory bail to Avinash and Venkatesh in Crime No. 114/2024 involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 3(5), 352, and 118(1) (assault and criminal intimidation arising from an October 2024 bar brawl). The court held that despite the charge sheet being filed, anticipatory bail could be granted since the offences are non-capital, the accused are permanent residents with property ties, custodial interrogation is unnecessary post-investigation, and stringent conditions can prevent trial interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 229/2026 Court Decision: The District and Sessions Judge, Davangere, GRANTED anticipatory bail to Avinash and Venkatesh in Crime No. 114/2024 involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 3(5), 352, and 118(1) (assault and criminal intimidation arising from an October 2024 bar brawl). The court held that despite the charge sheet being filed, anticipatory bail could be granted since the offences are non-capital, the accused are permanent residents with property ties, custodial interrogation is unnecessary post-investigation, and stringent conditions can prevent trial interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts