The State Extention PS Davanagere vs Vinay H.P. — 40/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307, 323, 324, 354(B), 504, 506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
SC - SESSION CASE
CNR: KADG010008862024
Filing Number
40/2024
Filing Date
15-03-2024
Registration No
40/2024
Registration Date
15-03-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
DAVANGERE EXTENSION PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Extention PS (Police Station) Davanagere
Adv. PP Davanagere
Respondent(s)
Vinay H.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCES CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 21-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCES CRIMINAL |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: State v. Doddeshi (SC No. 695/2023) The court acquitted the accused Doddeshi of all charges under IPC Sections 323, 354, 504, 506 (assault, outraging modesty, criminal intimidation) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v-a). The judge found material inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony versus her written complaint regarding the location of the incident, number of alleged perpetrators, and who was actually assaulted. Crucially, eyewitnesses (the complainant's son and another witness) testified that the accused did not commit any offense, while the co-accused persons were responsible. The prosecution failed to produce physical evidence or corroborate its case through medical evidence, leaving reasonable doubt about guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: State v. Doddeshi (SC No. 695/2023) The court acquitted the accused Doddeshi of all charges under IPC Sections 323, 354, 504, 506 (assault, outraging modesty, criminal intimidation) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v-a). The judge found material inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony versus her written complaint regarding the location of the incident, number of alleged perpetrators, and who was actually assaulted. Crucially, eyewitnesses (the complainant's son and another witness) testified that the accused did not commit any offense, while the co-accused persons were responsible. The prosecution failed to produce physical evidence or corroborate its case through medical evidence, leaving reasonable doubt about guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts