Canara bank R/by Power of Attorney Holder Ashok A Tikhe vs Chethan S M Advocate - N. CHITRALINGAPPA — 27/2023

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section 7,1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 23rd April 2026.

Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Case

CNR: KADG010008722023

Case disposed

Filing Number

27/2023

Filing Date

03-03-2023

Registration No

27/2023

Registration Date

03-03-2023

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 CPC Section 7,1

Petitioner(s)

Canara bank R/by Power of Attorney Holder Ashok A Tikhe

Adv. A.M. HEGDE

Respondent(s)

Chethan S M Advocate - N. CHITRALINGAPPA

Hearing History

Judge: 243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

23-04-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

JUDGMENTS CIVIL

07-04-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

13-03-2026

FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION

10-03-2026

FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Chethan S M (27/2023) Decision: The court decreed the plaintiff bank's suit in full. Canara Bank was awarded recovery of ₹7,48,185 from the defendant with interest at 12.9% per annum compounded monthly from the date of suit until realization. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant validly obtained a ₹5,00,000 loan on 18.06.2020 for maize business and failed to repay it. The defendant's defenses—that bank managers committed fraud, that documents were forged, and that he was a minor—were rejected as unsupported by evidence. The bank's documentary evidence (loan application, sanction letter, promissory note, account statements) remained unchallenged, and the defendant produced no witnesses or documents to substantiate his counterclaims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

30-05-2023
Issue
20-11-2024
Deposition
14-08-2025
Deposition
18-11-2025
Deposition
07-04-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Chethan S M (27/2023) Decision: The court decreed the plaintiff bank's suit in full. Canara Bank was awarded recovery of ₹7,48,185 from the defendant with interest at 12.9% per annum compounded monthly from the date of suit until realization. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant validly obtained a ₹5,00,000 loan on 18.06.2020 for maize business and failed to repay it. The defendant's defenses—that bank managers committed fraud, that documents were forged, and that he was a minor—were rejected as unsupported by evidence. The bank's documentary evidence (loan application, sanction letter, promissory note, account statements) remained unchallenged, and the defendant produced no witnesses or documents to substantiate his counterclaims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case