Canara bank R/by Power of Attorney Holder Ashok A Tikhe vs Chethan S M Advocate - N. CHITRALINGAPPA — 27/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section 7,1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 23rd April 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Case
CNR: KADG010008722023
Filing Number
27/2023
Filing Date
03-03-2023
Registration No
27/2023
Registration Date
03-03-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara bank R/by Power of Attorney Holder Ashok A Tikhe
Adv. A.M. HEGDE
Respondent(s)
Chethan S M Advocate - N. CHITRALINGAPPA
Hearing History
Judge: 243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
JUDGMENTS CIVIL
EVIDENCE CIVIL
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS CIVIL |
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
| 10-03-2026 | FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Chethan S M (27/2023) Decision: The court decreed the plaintiff bank's suit in full. Canara Bank was awarded recovery of ₹7,48,185 from the defendant with interest at 12.9% per annum compounded monthly from the date of suit until realization. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant validly obtained a ₹5,00,000 loan on 18.06.2020 for maize business and failed to repay it. The defendant's defenses—that bank managers committed fraud, that documents were forged, and that he was a minor—were rejected as unsupported by evidence. The bank's documentary evidence (loan application, sanction letter, promissory note, account statements) remained unchallenged, and the defendant produced no witnesses or documents to substantiate his counterclaims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Chethan S M (27/2023) Decision: The court decreed the plaintiff bank's suit in full. Canara Bank was awarded recovery of ₹7,48,185 from the defendant with interest at 12.9% per annum compounded monthly from the date of suit until realization. Key Reasoning: The court found that the defendant validly obtained a ₹5,00,000 loan on 18.06.2020 for maize business and failed to repay it. The defendant's defenses—that bank managers committed fraud, that documents were forged, and that he was a minor—were rejected as unsupported by evidence. The bank's documentary evidence (loan application, sanction letter, promissory note, account statements) remained unchallenged, and the defendant produced no witnesses or documents to substantiate his counterclaims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts