Kiran Naik vs State by Extension P S — 222/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADG010008672026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
223/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
222/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
889-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
230
Police Station
DAVANGERE EXTENSION PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kiran Naik
Adv. CHETHAN C SHEELAVANTH
Respondent(s)
State by Extension P S
Hearing History
Judge: 889-I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
ORDERS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 24-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 23-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 17-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.222/2026 Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge granted bail to Kiran Naik, who was accused of theft of gold ornaments (charges under BNS 2023 sections 331(3) and 305) at a wedding venue in November 2025. The court found that although the offences are non-bailable, they are not capital crimes, investigation was complete with property recovered, the accused has no criminal record, is a permanent resident with community ties, and expressed willingness to cooperate with trial. Key Conditions: Bail was approved on Rs.50,000 personal bond with surety, requiring the accused to refrain from tampering with witnesses, attend all court hearings, provide address proof, and avoid committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.222/2026 Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge granted bail to Kiran Naik, who was accused of theft of gold ornaments (charges under BNS 2023 sections 331(3) and 305) at a wedding venue in November 2025. The court found that although the offences are non-bailable, they are not capital crimes, investigation was complete with property recovered, the accused has no criminal record, is a permanent resident with community ties, and expressed willingness to cooperate with trial. Key Conditions: Bail was approved on Rs.50,000 personal bond with surety, requiring the accused to refrain from tampering with witnesses, attend all court hearings, provide address proof, and avoid committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts