Bharathesh vs Nagaraj R,N — 15/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION

CNR: KADG010008162026

Filing Number

15/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

890-II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bharathesh

    Adv. G.V. ONKARAPPA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagaraj R,N

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 15/2026 Summary: The II Additional District Judge, Davanagere allowed appellant Bharathesh's memo to convert a criminal revision petition to a criminal appeal. The appellant's counsel had inadvertently filed a criminal revision against the trial court's conviction and sentence instead of a criminal appeal. The court granted the conversion, reasoning that criminal appeal provides broader powers than criminal revision to challenge sentence orders, and directed the office to issue a separate case number for the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    For Clarification

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    For Clarification

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    For Clarification

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 15/2026 Summary: The II Additional District Judge, Davanagere allowed appellant Bharathesh's memo to convert a criminal revision petition to a criminal appeal. The appellant's counsel had inadvertently filed a criminal revision against the trial court's conviction and sentence instead of a criminal appeal. The court granted the conversion, reasoning that criminal appeal provides broader powers than criminal revision to challenge sentence orders, and directed the office to issue a separate case number for the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case