Bharathesh vs Nagaraj R,N — 15/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 08th April 2026.

CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION

CNR: KADG010008162026

Case disposed

Filing Number

15/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section 438
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 397

Petitioner(s)

Bharathesh

Adv. G.V. ONKARAPPA

Respondent(s)

Nagaraj R,N

Hearing History

Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

08-04-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

FOR CLARIFICATION

17-03-2026

FOR CLARIFICATION

13-03-2026

FOR CLARIFICATION

10-03-2026

FOR CLARIFICATION

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Orders

Case 15/2026 Summary: The II Additional District Judge, Davanagere allowed appellant Bharathesh's memo to convert a criminal revision petition to a criminal appeal. The appellant's counsel had inadvertently filed a criminal revision against the trial court's conviction and sentence instead of a criminal appeal. The court granted the conversion, reasoning that criminal appeal provides broader powers than criminal revision to challenge sentence orders, and directed the office to issue a separate case number for the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 15/2026 Summary: The II Additional District Judge, Davanagere allowed appellant Bharathesh's memo to convert a criminal revision petition to a criminal appeal. The appellant's counsel had inadvertently filed a criminal revision against the trial court's conviction and sentence instead of a criminal appeal. The court granted the conversion, reasoning that criminal appeal provides broader powers than criminal revision to challenge sentence orders, and directed the office to issue a separate case number for the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case