Smt.Sunitha C vs State by CEN police — 217/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KADG010007732026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

218/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

890-II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

CEN (CYBER, ECONOMIC AND NARCOTICS) CRIME PS,DAVANGERE

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt.Sunitha C

    Adv. Mohammed Saleem

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State by CEN police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.Misc./217/2026 Decision: The court dismissed Smt. Sunitha C.'s anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 of BNSS, finding a prima facie case against her for illegally manipulating property records in the e-Aasthi/e-Swathu system. The court determined that custodial interrogation was necessary, rejecting arguments that she was merely a bill collector unaware of document manipulation, noting her login credentials were essential to alter system data and some changes occurred during midnight hours. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders Criminal

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders Criminal

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Misc./217/2026 Decision: The court dismissed Smt. Sunitha C.'s anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 of BNSS, finding a prima facie case against her for illegally manipulating property records in the e-Aasthi/e-Swathu system. The court determined that custodial interrogation was necessary, rejecting arguments that she was merely a bill collector unaware of document manipulation, noting her login credentials were essential to alter system data and some changes occurred during midnight hours. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case