J Eshwar Singh Kavital vs State by Vidya Nagara PS — 215/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADG010007632026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
216/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
215/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
VIDYANAGAR PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
J Eshwar Singh Kavital
Adv. SHIVAKUMAR P V
Respondent(s)
State by Vidya Nagara PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
ORDERS CRIMINAL
HEARING
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 10-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 215/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to J. Eswar Singh Kavital (accused No. 2) in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod under Sections 109(1) and 352 of BNSS. The court found that while the prosecution established a prima facie case, stringent bail conditions could adequately address prosecution concerns about witness tampering and evidence interference. The court noted the victim sustained only minor injuries, investigation was substantially complete, and the petitioner had no criminal history and deep roots in the community. Bail was granted on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with matching surety, subject to six conditions including cooperation with investigation and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 215/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to J. Eswar Singh Kavital (accused No. 2) in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod under Sections 109(1) and 352 of BNSS. The court found that while the prosecution established a prima facie case, stringent bail conditions could adequately address prosecution concerns about witness tampering and evidence interference. The court noted the victim sustained only minor injuries, investigation was substantially complete, and the petitioner had no criminal history and deep roots in the community. Bail was granted on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with matching surety, subject to six conditions including cooperation with investigation and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts