J Eshwar Singh Kavital vs State by Vidya Nagara PS — 215/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KADG010007632026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

216/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

215/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

VIDYANAGAR PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section 482

Petitioner(s)

J Eshwar Singh Kavital

Adv. SHIVAKUMAR P V

Respondent(s)

State by Vidya Nagara PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

ORDERS CRIMINAL

16-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

OBJECTION

10-03-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Orders

Case 215/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to J. Eswar Singh Kavital (accused No. 2) in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod under Sections 109(1) and 352 of BNSS. The court found that while the prosecution established a prima facie case, stringent bail conditions could adequately address prosecution concerns about witness tampering and evidence interference. The court noted the victim sustained only minor injuries, investigation was substantially complete, and the petitioner had no criminal history and deep roots in the community. Bail was granted on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with matching surety, subject to six conditions including cooperation with investigation and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 215/2026 Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to J. Eswar Singh Kavital (accused No. 2) in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod under Sections 109(1) and 352 of BNSS. The court found that while the prosecution established a prima facie case, stringent bail conditions could adequately address prosecution concerns about witness tampering and evidence interference. The court noted the victim sustained only minor injuries, investigation was substantially complete, and the petitioner had no criminal history and deep roots in the community. Bail was granted on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with matching surety, subject to six conditions including cooperation with investigation and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case