Ramuni Ramandam vs State by Malebennur P S — 214/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KADG010007622026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

215/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

214/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

890-II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

MALEBENNUR PS

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramuni Ramandam

    Adv. CHANDRASHEKHAR T H

  2. 2.Ramuni Suman

  3. 3.Ramuni Sudhir

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State by Malebennur P S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary of Case 214/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three rice merchants (Ramuni Ramanatham, Ramuni Suman, and Ramuni Sudhir) who feared arrest in a dispute involving paddy trading and financial losses. The court found the underlying matter to be a monetary dispute between business associates rather than a criminal case, noted no FIR had been registered, and determined the petitioners were permanent residents with strong community ties and no flight risk. Bail was approved on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each with stringent conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders Criminal

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders Criminal

    II Addl District And Sessions Judge Davangere

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 214/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three rice merchants (Ramuni Ramanatham, Ramuni Suman, and Ramuni Sudhir) who feared arrest in a dispute involving paddy trading and financial losses. The court found the underlying matter to be a monetary dispute between business associates rather than a criminal case, noted no FIR had been registered, and determined the petitioners were permanent residents with strong community ties and no flight risk. Bail was approved on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each with stringent conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case