Dhananjayamurty B V vs State by Mayakonda PS — 213/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADG010007512026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
214/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
213/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
23
Police Station
MAYAKONDA PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhananjayamurty B V
Adv. MANOJ KUMAR M S
Smt. Sudha K.
Giridhara Nurthy B.V.
Mallikarjuna B.M.
Pushpavathi B.V.
Smt.Karibasamma B.V.
Sangamaradhya T.
K.S.Gangadhara
Respondent(s)
State by Mayakonda PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
ORDERS CRIMINAL
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 13-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 11-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 09-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to all eight accused in a dowry harassment case involving allegations that they subjected the complainant (wife of accused No. 1) to mental and physical abuse and demanded additional dowry of Rs. 2,00,000 and 5 tolas of gold. The court found no clear prima facie case existed, noted the three-month delay in filing the complaint raised credibility concerns, and applied the Supreme Court's precedent that matrimonial disputes warrant cautious bail consideration; bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each with surety and conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to all eight accused in a dowry harassment case involving allegations that they subjected the complainant (wife of accused No. 1) to mental and physical abuse and demanded additional dowry of Rs. 2,00,000 and 5 tolas of gold. The court found no clear prima facie case existed, noted the three-month delay in filing the complaint raised credibility concerns, and applied the Supreme Court's precedent that matrimonial disputes warrant cautious bail consideration; bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each with surety and conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts