Dhananjayamurty B V vs State by Mayakonda PS — 213/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KADG010007512026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

214/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

213/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

MAYAKONDA PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Dhananjayamurty B V

Adv. MANOJ KUMAR M S

Smt. Sudha K.

Giridhara Nurthy B.V.

Mallikarjuna B.M.

Pushpavathi B.V.

Smt.Karibasamma B.V.

Sangamaradhya T.

K.S.Gangadhara

Respondent(s)

State by Mayakonda PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

ORDERS CRIMINAL

13-03-2026

OBJECTION

11-03-2026

OBJECTION

09-03-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Orders

The court granted anticipatory bail to all eight accused in a dowry harassment case involving allegations that they subjected the complainant (wife of accused No. 1) to mental and physical abuse and demanded additional dowry of Rs. 2,00,000 and 5 tolas of gold. The court found no clear prima facie case existed, noted the three-month delay in filing the complaint raised credibility concerns, and applied the Supreme Court's precedent that matrimonial disputes warrant cautious bail consideration; bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each with surety and conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to all eight accused in a dowry harassment case involving allegations that they subjected the complainant (wife of accused No. 1) to mental and physical abuse and demanded additional dowry of Rs. 2,00,000 and 5 tolas of gold. The court found no clear prima facie case existed, noted the three-month delay in filing the complaint raised credibility concerns, and applied the Supreme Court's precedent that matrimonial disputes warrant cautious bail consideration; bail was granted on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds each with surety and conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case