Rafiq alias Mohamed Rafiq vs State By Rural P S, Davanagere — 201/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADG010007172026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
202/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
201/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
82
Police Station
DAVANGERE RURAL PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rafiq alias Mohamed Rafiq
Adv. HALLAPPA H M
Sadiq alias Sadiq R.
Sadath R.S.
Respondent(s)
State By Rural P S, Davanagere
Hearing History
Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
ORDERS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 10-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL |
| 04-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 201/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three hotel business owners (Rafiq, Sadiq, and Sadath) accused of assaulting a man and using caste-based abuse at their restaurant on February 19, 2026. The court found sufficient doubt regarding whether a prima facie case existed under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act provisions to warrant denying bail, particularly given conflicting evidence (victim photos versus petitioners' pen drive evidence). The petitioners were released on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds with stringent conditions including investigation cooperation, witness non-interference, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 201/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to three hotel business owners (Rafiq, Sadiq, and Sadath) accused of assaulting a man and using caste-based abuse at their restaurant on February 19, 2026. The court found sufficient doubt regarding whether a prima facie case existed under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act provisions to warrant denying bail, particularly given conflicting evidence (victim photos versus petitioners' pen drive evidence). The petitioners were released on Rs. 50,000 personal bonds with stringent conditions including investigation cooperation, witness non-interference, and regular court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts