Manjunath k So late Kallappa vs State by Malebennur ps — 188/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADG010006552026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
189/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
188/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE
Judge
243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
MALEBENNUR PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manjunath k So late Kallappa
Adv. Shivakumar E Kalal
Respondent(s)
State by Malebennur ps (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE
Disposed
ORDERS CRIMINAL
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDERS CRIMINAL |
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 05-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 03-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Manjunath K v. State of Karnataka (Crl.Misc. 188/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to Manjunath K for illegal sand transportation under Section 303(2) of the BNS, 2023. Although the prosecution argued serious charges involving unauthorized sand mining causing state exchequer loss, the court found the major investigation completed via seizure and held the non-capital offense did not justify detention. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including ₹50,000 bond, monthly police reporting, witness non-tampering, and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Manjunath K v. State of Karnataka (Crl.Misc. 188/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to Manjunath K for illegal sand transportation under Section 303(2) of the BNS, 2023. Although the prosecution argued serious charges involving unauthorized sand mining causing state exchequer loss, the court found the major investigation completed via seizure and held the non-capital offense did not justify detention. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including ₹50,000 bond, monthly police reporting, witness non-tampering, and court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts