K.Basavaraja vs M/s Polipack Industries, Amaravathi, Hosapete. Advocate - MALLIKARJUNA KANAVI — 2/2023

Case under Industrial Dispute Act 1947 Section 10(1)(c). Status: EVIDENCE CIVIL. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

IDact S10(1)(C) - Industrial Disputes u/s 10(1)(

CNR: KADG010002762023

EVIDENCE CIVIL

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

2/2023

Filing Date

18-01-2023

Registration No

2/2023

Registration Date

18-01-2023

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Acts & Sections

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE ACT 1947 Section 10(1)(c)

Petitioner(s)

K.Basavaraja

Adv. K B Gangadhar Naik

Respondent(s)

M/s Polipack Industries, Amaravathi, Hosapete. Advocate - MALLIKARJUNA KANAVI

Hearing History

Judge: 243-PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

11-05-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

02-05-2026

EVIDENCE CIVIL

15-04-2026

FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION

13-03-2026

FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION

04-03-2026

FOR SETTELEMENT / CONCILIATION

Interim Orders

16-01-2025
Deposition
19-11-2025
Deposition
11-05-2026
Deposition

This is a labor dispute case where witness examination is ongoing. On 11-05-2026, the petitioner K. Basavaraja (PW-1) testified regarding alleged wage deductions, overtime payment disputes, and festival advances at M/s Polipack Industries. The witness claimed discrepancies in salary calculations, unpaid overtime work, and contested the authenticity of certain documents (Exhibits 12-14). Cross-examination by the respondent's counsel proceeded regarding the witness's claims about work records and salary deductions. The case remains pending with examination-in-chief and cross-examination ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a labor dispute case where witness examination is ongoing. On 11-05-2026, the petitioner K. Basavaraja (PW-1) testified regarding alleged wage deductions, overtime payment disputes, and festival advances at M/s Polipack Industries. The witness claimed discrepancies in salary calculations, unpaid overtime work, and contested the authenticity of certain documents (Exhibits 12-14). Cross-examination by the respondent's counsel proceeded regarding the witness's claims about work records and salary deductions. The case remains pending with examination-in-chief and cross-examination ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case