B Praveena vs State by Mayakonda PS — 2/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION

CNR: KADG010002252026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

20-01-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE

Judge

890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 438

Petitioner(s)

B Praveena

Adv. PRAKASH PATIL

Respondent(s)

State by Mayakonda PS (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 890-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DAVANGERE

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDERS CRIMINAL

09-03-2026

ORDERS CRIMINAL

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS CRIMINAL

05-03-2026

OBJECTION

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: B Praveena v. State by Mayakonda PS (CRL.R.P.No.2/2026) The court dismissed B Praveena's revision petition challenging the trial court's condition requiring him to furnish a ₹2,00,000 bank guarantee or cash deposit to release his seized uninsured lorry. The accident involved a fatal motorcycle collision with Praveena's negligently parked vehicle, and the court upheld the condition as justified under Supreme Court precedent requiring adequate security from uninsured vehicle owners to satisfy potential compensation awards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B Praveena v. State by Mayakonda PS (CRL.R.P.No.2/2026) The court dismissed B Praveena's revision petition challenging the trial court's condition requiring him to furnish a ₹2,00,000 bank guarantee or cash deposit to release his seized uninsured lorry. The accident involved a fatal motorcycle collision with Praveena's negligently parked vehicle, and the court upheld the condition as justified under Supreme Court precedent requiring adequate security from uninsured vehicle owners to satisfy potential compensation awards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case