GUNDLUPET POLICE STATION vs Malishetty Advocate - P.S.GURUPRASAD — 568/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,341,324,149. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 03-Jul-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACN220012482025

Filing Number

568/2025

Filing Date

28-Aug-2025

Registration No

568/2025

Registration Date

28-Aug-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLUPET

Judge

212-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0336

Police Station

GUNDLUPET PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,341,324,149

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUNDLUPET POLICE STATION

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Malishetty Advocate - P.S.GURUPRASAD

  2. 2.Puttamadashetty

  3. 3.Mahesha

  4. 4.Bellamma

  5. 5.Ningamma

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  3. 30-May-2026

    Arguments

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  4. 20-May-2026

    Arguments

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Compliance By

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Compliance By

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Compliance By

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Compliance By

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  9. 04-Mar-2026

    Compliance By

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 568/2025 - Gundlupet Police Station Hearing Date: 16.02.2026 A witness (S. Mahesha, 59-year-old farmer) appeared before the Gundlupet Court and testified under oath. The witness denied certain allegations, stating he did not agree with Clauses 1 and 4 of the charges, and disowned certain statements attributed to him under Clause 2, which he claimed were misrepresented as Clause 2(D). The witness asserted he made no confession and surrendered no articles to police. The APP successfully argued to treat the witness as partially hostile and was permitted to conduct cross-examination. The case involves allegations of evidence collection on 01.12.2022, with a pistol reportedly seized. The court recorded the witness's statement and the case proceeded with cross-examination by the respondent's counsel, with no cross-examination noted from the police's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  13. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  15. 12-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  17. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  18. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  19. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  20. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  21. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet

  22. 28-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 28-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 568/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 568/2025 - Gundlupet Police Station Hearing Date: 16.02.2026 A witness (S. Mahesha, 59-year-old farmer) appeared before the Gundlupet Court and testified under oath. The witness denied certain allegations, stating he did not agree with Clauses 1 and 4 of the charges, and disowned certain statements attributed to him under Clause 2, which he claimed were misrepresented as Clause 2(D). The witness asserted he made no confession and surrendered no articles to police. The APP successfully argued to treat the witness as partially hostile and was permitted to conduct cross-examination. The case involves allegations of evidence collection on 01.12.2022, with a pistol reportedly seized. The court recorded the witness's statement and the case proceeded with cross-examination by the respondent's counsel, with no cross-examination noted from the police's side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case