AMBIKA vs BASAVANNA Advocate - MANU SHANUBOG M. — 197/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7,RULE1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACN220008542024
Filing Number
199/2024
Filing Date
17-Aug-2024
Registration No
197/2024
Registration Date
21-Aug-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLUPET
Judge
212-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
Last updated 26-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMBIKA
Adv. NAGENDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BASAVANNA Advocate - MANU SHANUBOG M.
-
2.SHIVANAGAMMA
Adv. Exparte
-
3.M. MANJU
Adv. NANDEESHA S N
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
09-Jun-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
24-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
23-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary - OS 197/2024 The court recorded the testimony of witness Ambika on 23.03.2026 regarding a dispute over inherited property. Ambika claims she is entitled to a share of agricultural land (survey nos. 75/2, 76/3, and 26/6) allegedly sold by her brother (respondent 3) without her consent around 2005. The witness testified that only 5 acres remain in her family's name and that the property was sold to settle debts. The court admitted three survey documents as exhibits. The witness maintained she had no prior knowledge of the sale and asserts her right to a portion of the property, though cross-examination suggested contradictions regarding her age at the time of the transaction and her earlier awareness of the sale. The matter remains under consideration with no final order yet issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
13-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
17-Nov-2025
For Settlement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
23-Aug-2025
IssueView PDF
-
23-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
11-Aug-2025
Issues
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
08-Aug-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
14-Jul-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
08-Jul-2025
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
02-Jul-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
27-Jun-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
18-Jun-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
03-May-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
24-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
05-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
05-Mar-2025
Arguments
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
07-Dec-2024
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
28-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
14-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
17-Sep-2024
Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
24-Aug-2024
OrdersView PDF
-
24-Aug-2024
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Gundlupet
-
22-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 197/2024
Case Summary - OS 197/2024 The court recorded the testimony of witness Ambika on 23.03.2026 regarding a dispute over inherited property. Ambika claims she is entitled to a share of agricultural land (survey nos. 75/2, 76/3, and 26/6) allegedly sold by her brother (respondent 3) without her consent around 2005. The witness testified that only 5 acres remain in her family's name and that the property was sold to settle debts. The court admitted three survey documents as exhibits. The witness maintained she had no prior knowledge of the sale and asserts her right to a portion of the property, though cross-examination suggested contradictions regarding her age at the time of the transaction and her earlier awareness of the sale. The matter remains under consideration with no final order yet issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts