State by Lingadahalli PS vs Thejas — 2835/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506,341,34,504,323,324. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM710038732022
e-Filing Number
02-12-2022
Filing Number
2835/2022
Filing Date
02-Dec-2022
Registration No
2835/2022
Registration Date
02-Dec-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
1047-I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State by Lingadahalli PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Thejas
-
2.GIREESHA
-
3.MANJUNATHA
-
4.GAGANA T L
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgment
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 2835/2022, Karnataka High Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 341, 504, 324, 323, and 506 with Section 34 (criminal conspiracy). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because key witnesses (including the complainant and injured parties) admitted during testimony that they had settled the dispute with the accused out of court, rendering their evidence unreliable and unhelpful to the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
03-Mar-2026
Judgments
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
23-Feb-2026
Deposition
-
23-Feb-2026
Deposition
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
30-Dec-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
01-Dec-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
24-Nov-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
03-Nov-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
24-Oct-2025
Hearing
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
24-Oct-2025
Restored
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
09-Sep-2025
Orders
-
09-Sep-2025
Disposed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
08-Sep-2025
For Committal
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
19-Aug-2025
Charge
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
14-Jul-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
03-Jun-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
21-Apr-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
17-Mar-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
10-Feb-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
24-Dec-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
16-Dec-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
14-Dec-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
04-Dec-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
21-Sep-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
24-Jun-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
06-May-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
06-Feb-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
16-Nov-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
24-Jul-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
18-May-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
13-Feb-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
03-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 2835/2022
Court Decision Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 2835/2022, Karnataka High Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 341, 504, 324, 323, and 506 with Section 34 (criminal conspiracy). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because key witnesses (including the complainant and injured parties) admitted during testimony that they had settled the dispute with the accused out of court, rendering their evidence unreliable and unhelpful to the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts