State by Birur Police vs MANJUANTHA B R — 1949/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM710029642023

e-Filing Number

25-11-2023

Filing Number

1949/2023

Filing Date

25-Nov-2023

Registration No

1949/2023

Registration Date

25-Nov-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE

Judge

1047-I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0108

Police Station

BIRUR PS

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State by Birur Police

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANJUANTHA B R

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  9. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  11. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  12. 16-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  13. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  14. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  15. 05-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 05-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 1949/2023 This is a witness examination (PW-3) in criminal case 1949/2023 before the Civil Judge & Additional JMFC, Tarikere. Witness Ravikumar (age 41, farmer from Pundanahalli) testified on 06-06-2025. During examination-in-chief, the witness identified documents (NP-2 mahazar and photographs NP-3, NP-4) but claimed lack of knowledge about the case details and the circumstances under which documents were signed. The APP then cross-examined the witness as an adverse witness, during which the witness contradicted the prosecution's version regarding the on-site inspection (mahazar) preparation, timing of photographs, and the manner of obtaining his signature. No cross-examination followed from the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  18. 09-May-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  19. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  20. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  21. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  22. 15-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  24. 06-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  26. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  27. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  28. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  29. 31-Jul-2024

    PleaView PDF

  30. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  31. 24-Apr-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  32. 25-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 25-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1949/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1949/2023 This is a witness examination (PW-3) in criminal case 1949/2023 before the Civil Judge & Additional JMFC, Tarikere. Witness Ravikumar (age 41, farmer from Pundanahalli) testified on 06-06-2025. During examination-in-chief, the witness identified documents (NP-2 mahazar and photographs NP-3, NP-4) but claimed lack of knowledge about the case details and the circumstances under which documents were signed. The APP then cross-examined the witness as an adverse witness, during which the witness contradicted the prosecution's version regarding the on-site inspection (mahazar) preparation, timing of photographs, and the manner of obtaining his signature. No cross-examination followed from the defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case