Rathnamma W/o late Hanumantappa,54years,R/o Lingadahalli village,Hobli,Tarikere Tq,CKM. vs PDO,Lingadahalli Grama Panchayathi Karyalaya,Lingadahalli Village and Hobli,Tarikere Tq,CKM. — 357/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1, and ,Sec.26, of ,CPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM710029242022
Filing Number
357/2022
Filing Date
17-Aug-2022
Registration No
357/2022
Registration Date
17-Aug-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
227-Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rathnamma W/o late Hanumantappa,54years,R/o Lingadahalli village,Hobli,Tarikere Tq,CKM.
Adv. M.K.THEJAMURTHY
Respondent(s)
-
1.PDO,Lingadahalli Grama Panchayathi Karyalaya,Lingadahalli Village and Hobli,Tarikere Tq,CKM.
-
2.Tahashildar, Taluku Office,Mini Vidhana Soudha,N.H.206 Road,Tarikere Town and Tq,CKM.
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
07-Jan-2026
IssueView PDF
The document provided only contains the issue formulation stage of case O.S. No. 347/2024 (dated 07.01.2026), not the final judgment or order. The court has framed four issues regarding Rathnamma's possession of suit property, alleged interference by the PDO and Tahsildar, and entitlement to permanent prohibitory injunction, but the actual ruling/decree is not included in the submitted document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
17-Dec-2025
Issues
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
10-Nov-2025
Mediation for the Nation
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
22-Sep-2025
Mediation for the Nation
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
04-Aug-2025
Mediation for the Nation
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
12-Jul-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
02-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
12-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
12-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
07-Dec-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
19-Sep-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
07-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
31-May-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
07-Mar-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
23-Jan-2023
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
21-Nov-2022
For compliance
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
06-Sep-2022
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
18-Aug-2022
OrdersView PDF
-
18-Aug-2022
Summons
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
17-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 357/2022
The document provided only contains the issue formulation stage of case O.S. No. 347/2024 (dated 07.01.2026), not the final judgment or order. The court has framed four issues regarding Rathnamma's possession of suit property, alleged interference by the PDO and Tahsildar, and entitlement to permanent prohibitory injunction, but the actual ruling/decree is not included in the submitted document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts