Laxmana S/o Rangegowda,66years,R/o Baragenahalli village,Tarikere Tq. vs Ramu S/o Venkatappa,66years,R/o Baragenahalli village,Tarikere Tq. — 235/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1, of, CPC. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACM710016462022

Filing Number

235/2022

Filing Date

09-Jun-2022

Registration No

235/2022

Registration Date

09-Jun-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE

Judge

227-Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7,Rule,1, of, CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxmana S/o Rangegowda,66years,R/o Baragenahalli village,Tarikere Tq.

    Adv. T.R.SRINIVASA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramu S/o Venkatappa,66years,R/o Baragenahalli village,Tarikere Tq.

  2. 2.Mahesha S/o Ramu,36years,R/o Baragenahalli village,Tarikere Tq.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 235/2022 Laxmana sought permanent injunction against neighbors Ramu and Mahesha to prevent trespass on his agricultural land (Sy. No. 54/3, 1 acre 2 guntas). The court dismissed the suit, finding the plaintiff failed to prove lawful possession and alleged interference. The court noted the plaintiff's sale deed showed only 1 acre purchased, yet he claimed 2 additional guntas, which revenue records didn't identify as separate kharab land, indicating mala fides and lack of clean hands in approaching the court for equitable relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  14. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  15. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  16. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  17. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  18. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  19. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  20. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  21. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  22. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  23. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  24. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  25. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  26. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  27. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  28. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  29. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  30. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  31. 17-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  32. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  33. 03-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  34. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  35. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  36. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  37. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  38. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  39. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  40. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  41. 19-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  42. 14-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  43. 18-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  44. 19-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  45. 21-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  46. 24-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  47. 31-May-2023

    IssueView PDF

  48. 31-May-2023

    A.D.R.

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  49. 18-Mar-2023

    A.D.R.

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  50. 07-Mar-2023

    Arguments

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  51. 14-Feb-2023

    Arguments

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  52. 09-Jan-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  53. 09-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  54. 25-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  55. 15-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  56. 16-Aug-2022

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  57. 01-Jul-2022

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  58. 10-Jun-2022

    OrdersView PDF

  59. 10-Jun-2022

    Summons

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  60. 09-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 09-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 235/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 235/2022 Laxmana sought permanent injunction against neighbors Ramu and Mahesha to prevent trespass on his agricultural land (Sy. No. 54/3, 1 acre 2 guntas). The court dismissed the suit, finding the plaintiff failed to prove lawful possession and alleged interference. The court noted the plaintiff's sale deed showed only 1 acre purchased, yet he claimed 2 additional guntas, which revenue records didn't identify as separate kharab land, indicating mala fides and lack of clean hands in approaching the court for equitable relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case