Lakkavali Police Station vs MANJAPPA — 1038/2022

Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 34,32. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM710013662022

e-Filing Number

05-04-2022

Filing Number

1038/2022

Filing Date

05-Apr-2022

Registration No

1038/2022

Registration Date

05-Apr-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE

Judge

1047-I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0124

Police Station

LAKKAVALLI PS

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 34,32

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lakkavali Police Station

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANJAPPA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Judgment

    Case Summary: 1038/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant MANJAPPA of charges under the Karnataka Abkari Act, Sections 32 and 34 (illegal possession and sale of liquor). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to conclusively establish the charges due to significant inconsistencies in witness testimony, particularly from key eyewitnesses (ASA-2 and ASA-3) whose accounts contained contradictions and doubts regarding location details and seizure procedures. The court found the circumstantial evidence insufficient to overcome reasonable doubt, applying the principle that the benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  4. 12-May-2026

    Judgments

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  5. 11-May-2026

    313 Statement

  6. 11-May-2026

    For compliance

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  7. 07-May-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  8. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  12. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  13. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  14. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  15. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  16. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  17. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  18. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  19. 24-Nov-2025

    Deposition

  20. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  21. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  22. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  23. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  24. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  25. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  26. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  27. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  28. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  29. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  30. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  31. 19-May-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  32. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  33. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  34. 24-Feb-2025

    Deposition

  35. 24-Feb-2025

    Deposition

  36. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  37. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  38. 16-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  39. 10-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  40. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  41. 02-May-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  42. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  43. 01-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  44. 30-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  45. 15-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  46. 09-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  47. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  48. 07-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  49. 06-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  50. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  51. 27-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  52. 24-Mar-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  53. 29-Nov-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  54. 09-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  55. 29-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  56. 11-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  57. 26-Sep-2022

    Deposition

  58. 26-Sep-2022

    Deposition

  59. 26-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  60. 25-Jul-2022

    Charge

  61. 25-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  62. 06-Jun-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  63. 05-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 05-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1038/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1038/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant MANJAPPA of charges under the Karnataka Abkari Act, Sections 32 and 34 (illegal possession and sale of liquor). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to conclusively establish the charges due to significant inconsistencies in witness testimony, particularly from key eyewitnesses (ASA-2 and ASA-3) whose accounts contained contradictions and doubts regarding location details and seizure procedures. The court found the circumstantial evidence insufficient to overcome reasonable doubt, applying the principle that the benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case