T.R.Nagaraj S/o Late Revanna, 75 years, Agrlt, R/o Lingadahalli main Road, Tarikere Town vs Sathish Kumar H.O. S/o Late H.M.Onkaraswamy, 58 years, Agrlt, R/o Thyagarajanagara, Tarikere Town — 606/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U/S,138,of,NI,Act. Status: ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM710011022024
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
Filing Number
606/2024
Filing Date
11-06-2024
Registration No
606/2024
Registration Date
11-06-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
227-PRL CIVIL JUDGE and JMFCTARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T.R.Nagaraj S/o Late Revanna, 75 years, Agrlt, R/o Lingadahalli main Road, Tarikere Town
Adv. B.N.KIRANKUMAR
Respondent(s)
Sathish Kumar H.O. S/o Late H.M.Onkaraswamy, 58 years, Agrlt, R/o Thyagarajanagara, Tarikere Town
Hearing History
Judge: 227-PRL CIVIL JUDGE and JMFCTARIKERE
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 02-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 31-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 20-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 25-10-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 606/2024 at the Tarikere Court, the accused Smt. Sathish Kumar H.O. was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 55,00,000 that was returned due to insufficient funds, and failing to pay within the statutory period despite legal notice. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to have a defense, and the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 606/2024 at the Tarikere Court, the accused Smt. Sathish Kumar H.O. was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 55,00,000 that was returned due to insufficient funds, and failing to pay within the statutory period despite legal notice. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to have a defense, and the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts