Sri. Kushal K.S. S/o Santhosh, Aged about 22 years, Agriculturist, , vs Kiran Kumar Y M S/o Mallappa, Aged about 29 years, Agriculturist, — 38/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KACM710006472026

Filing Number

38/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

38/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE

Judge

227-Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri. Kushal K.S. S/o Santhosh, Aged about 22 years, Agriculturist, ,

    Adv. C.N.JYOTHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kiran Kumar Y M S/o Mallappa, Aged about 29 years, Agriculturist,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    The court (Prl. C.J. & JMFC., Tarikere) recorded the testimony of PW-1 on 06-04-2026 in PCR Case No. 38/2026. The witness affirmed their statement and submitted documentary evidence including a check (Ex.P-1), bank return (Ex.P-2), legal notice (Ex.P-3), postal receipts (Ex.P-4 to P-6), and postal tracking status. The court admitted all exhibits and the witness prayed for legal action to be taken against the respondent (Kiran Kumar Y M). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court (Prl. C.J. & JMFC., Tarikere) recorded the testimony of PW-1 on 06-04-2026 in PCR Case No. 38/2026. The witness affirmed their statement and submitted documentary evidence including a check (Ex.P-1), bank return (Ex.P-2), legal notice (Ex.P-3), postal receipts (Ex.P-4 to P-6), and postal tracking status. The court admitted all exhibits and the witness prayed for legal action to be taken against the respondent (Kiran Kumar Y M). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case