Thammaiahppa S/o Late Mariyappa, Aged about 63 years, Agriculturist, vs Smt.Chandramma W/o Late Veerappa, Aged about 55 years, Agriculturist, — 96/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section under,order,7,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM710005222025
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
96/2025
Filing Date
27-02-2025
Registration No
96/2025
Registration Date
27-02-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
1047-I ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCTARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thammaiahppa S/o Late Mariyappa, Aged about 63 years, Agriculturist,
Adv. S.SURESH CHANDRA
Murthappa S/o Late Mariyappa, 59 yrs, Agriculturist,
Shivappa S/o Late Mariyappa, 58 years, Agriculturist,
Chandrappa S/o Late Mariyappa, 50 yrs, Agriculturist,
Respondent(s)
Smt.Chandramma W/o Late Veerappa, Aged about 55 years, Agriculturist,
Adarsha S/o Late Veerappa, Aged about 30 years, Agriculturist,
Smt. Lakshmamma W/o Late Veerappa,45 yrs, Agriculturist,
Hearing History
Judge: 1047-I ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCTARIKERE
HEARING
HEARING
For orders
For orders
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | For orders |
| 02-02-2026 | For orders |
| 30-01-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in this partition suit. The defendants are hereby restrained from alienating or mortgaging the disputed ancestral property in any manner until the suit is disposed of. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favors them, and they would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in this partition suit. The defendants are hereby restrained from alienating or mortgaging the disputed ancestral property in any manner until the suit is disposed of. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favors them, and they would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts