Thammaiahppa S/o Late Mariyappa, Aged about 63 years, Agriculturist, vs Smt.Chandramma W/o Late Veerappa, Aged about 55 years, Agriculturist, — 96/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section under,order,7,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 03-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACM710005222025

Filing Number

96/2025

Filing Date

27-Feb-2025

Registration No

96/2025

Registration Date

27-Feb-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE

Judge

1047-I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section under,order,7,Rule,1,and,2,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thammaiahppa S/o Late Mariyappa, Aged about 63 years, Agriculturist,

    Adv. S.SURESH CHANDRA

  2. 2.Murthappa S/o Late Mariyappa, 59 yrs, Agriculturist,

  3. 3.Shivappa S/o Late Mariyappa, 58 years, Agriculturist,

  4. 4.Chandrappa S/o Late Mariyappa, 50 yrs, Agriculturist,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt.Chandramma W/o Late Veerappa, Aged about 55 years, Agriculturist,

  2. 2.Adarsha S/o Late Veerappa, Aged about 30 years, Agriculturist,

  3. 3.Smt. Lakshmamma W/o Late Veerappa,45 yrs, Agriculturist,

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in this partition suit. The defendants are hereby restrained from alienating or mortgaging the disputed ancestral property in any manner until the suit is disposed of. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favors them, and they would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    For orders

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    For orders

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  13. 18-Dec-2025

    For Objection

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  14. 04-Dec-2025

    For Objection

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  15. 27-Nov-2025

    For Objection

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  16. 15-Nov-2025

    For Objection

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  17. 16-Oct-2025

    For Objection

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Summons

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  19. 17-Sep-2025

    Summons

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  20. 11-Sep-2025

    Mediation for the Nation

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  21. 10-Sep-2025

    Mediation for the Nation

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  22. 20-Aug-2025

    Mediation for the Nation

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  23. 25-Jul-2025

    Summons

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  24. 17-Jul-2025

    Summons

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  25. 09-Jul-2025

    Summons

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  26. 20-Jun-2025

    Summons

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  27. 03-May-2025

    Summons

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  28. 05-Apr-2025

    Summons

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  29. 03-Mar-2025

    Summons

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  30. 01-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere

  31. 27-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 27-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in this partition suit. The defendants are hereby restrained from alienating or mortgaging the disputed ancestral property in any manner until the suit is disposed of. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favors them, and they would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case