State by Lingadahalli PS vs Aruna Rodrigos @ Aruna Rodrigos S/o Siril Rodrigos, 38yrs, R/o Mavinakere colony, Bhadravathi Taluk — 331/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/S279,304(A),of,IPC,and,187,IMV,Act. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM710004772021
Filing Number
331/2021
Filing Date
18-Feb-2021
Registration No
331/2021
Registration Date
18-Feb-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
1047-I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
LINGADAHALLI PS
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State by Lingadahalli PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aruna Rodrigos @ Aruna Rodrigos S/o Siril Rodrigos, 38yrs, R/o Mavinakere colony, Bhadravathi Taluk
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Aruna Rodrigos (Case 331/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Aruna Rodrigos, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304(A) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 187. Key Facts: On February 11, 2020, a truck (KA-52/7841) driven by the accused allegedly collided with a two-wheeler (KA-66/ZE-5713), causing the death of the rider. The prosecution charged the accused with rash/negligent driving and causing death by negligence. Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses—including the motorcycle rider's companion and investigating officials—testified inconsistently and lacked direct knowledge of how the accident occurred. Critical witnesses could not confirm whether the truck was speeding or negligently driven, and several prosecution witnesses admitted police pressure influenced their statements. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accident resulted from the accused's rash or negligent driving, and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgments
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
12-Mar-2026
313 StatementView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgments
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
09-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
02-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
05-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
02-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
28-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
23-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
01-Apr-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
27-Jan-2025
PleaView PDF
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
28-Oct-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
13-Aug-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
01-Jul-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
18-May-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
15-Apr-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
20-Mar-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
15-Nov-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
18-Oct-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
26-Jun-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
19-May-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
14-Feb-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
07-Nov-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
23-Aug-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
06-Jun-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
27-Apr-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
22-Feb-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
27-Dec-2021
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
21-Oct-2021
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
19-Oct-2021
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
04-Sep-2021
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
15-Jun-2021
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
29-Apr-2021
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl.civil Judge And Jmfctarikere
-
18-Mar-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 331/2021
Case Summary: State v. Aruna Rodrigos (Case 331/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Aruna Rodrigos, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304(A) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 187. Key Facts: On February 11, 2020, a truck (KA-52/7841) driven by the accused allegedly collided with a two-wheeler (KA-66/ZE-5713), causing the death of the rider. The prosecution charged the accused with rash/negligent driving and causing death by negligence. Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses—including the motorcycle rider's companion and investigating officials—testified inconsistently and lacked direct knowledge of how the accident occurred. Critical witnesses could not confirm whether the truck was speeding or negligently driven, and several prosecution witnesses admitted police pressure influenced their statements. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accident resulted from the accused's rash or negligent driving, and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts