T.G.Omprakash S/o T.H.Gosappa, 40 years vs Deputy Conservator of Forest, Karnataka Forest Department, Shivamogga — 70/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Or,7,Rule,1,and,2,R/w,Sec.26,of,CPC. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM710002202025
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
70/2025
Filing Date
12-02-2025
Registration No
70/2025
Registration Date
12-02-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
1047-I ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCTARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T.G.Omprakash S/o T.H.Gosappa, 40 years
Adv. LAKSHMANA
Respondent(s)
Deputy Conservator of Forest, Karnataka Forest Department, Shivamogga
Asst.Conservator of Forest, Karnataka Forest Department, Tarikere Sub Division, Tarikere
Range forest Officer, Karnataka Forest Department, Tarikere Taluk
Hearing History
Judge: 1047-I ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFCTARIKERE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Original Case No. 70/2025 before the 1st Additional Civil Judge court at Turkeere, the hearing held on 27-10-2025 recorded the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) and admitted documentary evidence including 9 photocopies (NIP-6) and 1 pen drive (NIP-10). The defendant's counsel requested time for cross-examination, and the case has been adjourned to the next hearing date for the defendant to conduct cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Original Case No. 70/2025 before the 1st Additional Civil Judge court at Turkeere, the hearing held on 27-10-2025 recorded the plaintiff's witness (PW-1) and admitted documentary evidence including 9 photocopies (NIP-6) and 1 pen drive (NIP-10). The defendant's counsel requested time for cross-examination, and the case has been adjourned to the next hearing date for the defendant to conduct cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts