Sri.Harish Gowda vs Nandakumar — 75/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/Sec.138,of,N.I,ACT. Status: Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 16th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM710002042025
Filing Number
75/2025
Filing Date
10-Feb-2025
Registration No
75/2025
Registration Date
10-Feb-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
227-Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri.Harish Gowda
Adv. ASEEM AHAMED
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nandakumar
Case History
-
16-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
29-Dec-2025
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
24-Dec-2025
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
22-Nov-2025
PleaView PDF
Summary The accused Sri. Nandakumar was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 3,00,000 dated 22.05.2024 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds and incomplete drawer's signature. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to have a defense. The case has been recorded for trial proceedings to commence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Nov-2025
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
27-Sep-2025
Mediation for the Nation
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
16-Aug-2025
Mediation for the Nation
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
04-Aug-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
03-Jul-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
13-May-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
21-Mar-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl CIVIL Judge and Jmfctarikere
-
10-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 75/2025
Summary The accused Sri. Nandakumar was charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 3,00,000 dated 22.05.2024 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds and incomplete drawer's signature. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to have a defense. The case has been recorded for trial proceedings to commence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts