T.K.Prakash vs T.G.Annaiah — 41/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Ord,21,rule,32of,CPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KACM700014592022

HEARING

Next Hearing

02nd May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

41/2022

Filing Date

05-08-2022

Registration No

41/2022

Registration Date

05-08-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE

Judge

226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/Ord,21,rule,32of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

T.K.Prakash

Adv. T.L.Prakash

Respondent(s)

T.G.Annaiah

Hearing History

Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE

09-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

For orders

17-01-2026

HEARING

06-12-2025

NOTICE

31-10-2025

For orders

Interim Orders

02-07-2024
Deposition
21-08-2024
Deposition
28-08-2024
Deposition
25-09-2024
Deposition
24-02-2025
Orders
24-02-2025
Orders
06-12-2025
Orders

Summary: The court rejected applications filed by an objector (Manjunath) seeking release of attached property and stay of its sale in execution proceedings. The Senior Civil Judge found that the objector's family had no legal claim to the property (Assessment No. 4127/4018), as this had been conclusively determined in an earlier application dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 10,000. The current applications were deemed an abuse of process and barred by principles of res judicata (Section 11 CPC), consequently both applications were dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected applications filed by an objector (Manjunath) seeking release of attached property and stay of its sale in execution proceedings. The Senior Civil Judge found that the objector's family had no legal claim to the property (Assessment No. 4127/4018), as this had been conclusively determined in an earlier application dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 10,000. The current applications were deemed an abuse of process and barred by principles of res judicata (Section 11 CPC), consequently both applications were dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case