SHO TARIKERE P.S. vs CHANDRA NAIKA Advocate - BPV — 995/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 34,32,OFK.E.ACT. Status: For compliance. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM700014562023
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
e-Filing Number
26-07-2023
Filing Number
995/2023
Filing Date
26-07-2023
Registration No
995/2023
Registration Date
26-07-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) TARIKERE P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
CHANDRA NAIKA Advocate - BPV
Hearing History
Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
For compliance
ARGUMENTS
Issue NBW
For compliance
For compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | For compliance |
| 22-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 28-11-2025 | Issue NBW |
| 23-10-2025 | For compliance |
| 23-09-2025 | For compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: CC No. 995/2023, Turikere Police vs. Chandranayak Outcome: The accused's statement was recorded under CrPC Section 313. The court examined the accused through multiple questions regarding the allegations against him based on witness testimony and evidence, including the recovery of 95 bottles of 90 ML whiskey. The accused was given opportunities to respond to the prosecution witnesses' statements and to present his defense. The proceedings were conducted on 23.09.2025 and the statement was confirmed as accurate and truthful by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: CC No. 995/2023, Turikere Police vs. Chandranayak Outcome: The accused's statement was recorded under CrPC Section 313. The court examined the accused through multiple questions regarding the allegations against him based on witness testimony and evidence, including the recovery of 95 bottles of 90 ML whiskey. The accused was given opportunities to respond to the prosecution witnesses' statements and to present his defense. The proceedings were conducted on 23.09.2025 and the statement was confirmed as accurate and truthful by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts