THE STATE or THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. vs KRISHNA Advocate - DCP — 899/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 34,32ofKEACT. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM700012752022

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

30th April 2026

e-Filing Number

13-07-2022

Filing Number

899/2022

Filing Date

13-07-2022

Registration No

899/2022

Registration Date

13-07-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE

Judge

226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 34,32ofKEACT

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE or THE STATE OF KARNATAKA.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KRISHNA Advocate - DCP (Deputy Commissioner of Police)

Hearing History

Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE

20-11-2025

EVIDENCE

16-09-2025

EVIDENCE

15-07-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

20-06-2023
Charge
31-07-2023
Deposition
06-11-2023
Deposition
19-08-2024
Deposition

A witness (Venugopal) testified in Civil Case No. 899/2022 before the Senior Civil Judge in Turkakaré on 19-08-2024, providing sworn evidence regarding events from November 1, 2021. The witness's statement was recorded in open court and various documents were identified as exhibits (NIP-4, NIP-5, etc.). The cross-examination by the opposing counsel challenged the witness's credibility regarding allegations that false documents were submitted. No further cross-examination was conducted, and the court proceeded with the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

A witness (Venugopal) testified in Civil Case No. 899/2022 before the Senior Civil Judge in Turkakaré on 19-08-2024, providing sworn evidence regarding events from November 1, 2021. The witness's statement was recorded in open court and various documents were identified as exhibits (NIP-4, NIP-5, etc.). The cross-examination by the opposing counsel challenged the witness's credibility regarding allegations that false documents were submitted. No further cross-examination was conducted, and the court proceeded with the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case