L.T.Laxmana vs Onkarappa Advocate - K.Lingaraju — 11/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,rule,13,ofCPC. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KACM700012422024
Filing Number
11/2024
Filing Date
29-Nov-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
29-Nov-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.L.T.Laxmana
Adv. J.Krishnakumar, Arasikere
Respondent(s)
-
1.Onkarappa Advocate - K.Lingaraju
Case History
-
18-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
In this Civil Misc case (C.Misc.No.:11/2024), the court examined witness testimony on 07.03.2026 and recorded various documents as exhibits (NIPIs 1-5, 13). The respondent's counsel contested the petitioner's claims, arguing lack of proper documentation, false allegations, and that all assertions in the petition were baseless. The court proceeded with examination of the witness and directed the witness's examination notes be attached to the respondent's counsel's file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
07-Feb-2026
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
22-Nov-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
10-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
23-Aug-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
28-Feb-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
24-Jan-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
29-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2024
In this Civil Misc case (C.Misc.No.:11/2024), the court examined witness testimony on 07.03.2026 and recorded various documents as exhibits (NIPIs 1-5, 13). The respondent's counsel contested the petitioner's claims, arguing lack of proper documentation, false allegations, and that all assertions in the petition were baseless. The court proceeded with examination of the witness and directed the witness's examination notes be attached to the respondent's counsel's file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts