P.I.TARIKERE P.S. vs MAHAMAD GOWS — 385/2025
Case under Karnataka Police Act 1963 Section 78(3),of,KP,Act. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM700009412025
Next Hearing
14th March 2026
e-Filing Number
27-10-2025
Filing Number
386/2025
Filing Date
27-10-2025
Registration No
385/2025
Registration Date
27-10-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.I.TARIKERE P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MAHAMAD GOWS
Hearing History
Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
A.D.R.
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 23-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 27-10-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
Summary The accused, Mohammad Ghaus (38 years, laborer), was charged under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act for operating an illegal matka (gambling) racket on 04.08.2025 in a public place, collecting money from the public by writing numbers and making false promises of returns. The case was taken cognizance by the court, and during the hearing on 06.03.2026, the charges were read and explained to the accused, with questions posed regarding his plea. The order documents the accused's response to the charges but does not explicitly state a final judgment on bail or conviction at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The accused, Mohammad Ghaus (38 years, laborer), was charged under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act for operating an illegal matka (gambling) racket on 04.08.2025 in a public place, collecting money from the public by writing numbers and making false promises of returns. The case was taken cognizance by the court, and during the hearing on 06.03.2026, the charges were read and explained to the accused, with questions posed regarding his plea. The order documents the accused's response to the charges but does not explicitly state a final judgment on bail or conviction at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts