P.I.TARIKERE P.S. vs MAHAMAD GOWS — 385/2025
Case under Karnataka Police Act 1963 Section 78(3),of,KP,Act. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM700009412025
e-Filing Number
27-10-2025
Filing Number
386/2025
Filing Date
27-Oct-2025
Registration No
385/2025
Registration Date
27-Oct-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.I.TARIKERE P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHAMAD GOWS
Case History
-
14-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
PleaView PDF
Summary The accused, Mohammad Ghaus (38 years, laborer), was charged under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act for operating an illegal matka (gambling) racket on 04.08.2025 in a public place, collecting money from the public by writing numbers and making false promises of returns. The case was taken cognizance by the court, and during the hearing on 06.03.2026, the charges were read and explained to the accused, with questions posed regarding his plea. The order documents the accused's response to the charges but does not explicitly state a final judgment on bail or conviction at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
23-Jan-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
27-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 385/2025
Summary The accused, Mohammad Ghaus (38 years, laborer), was charged under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act for operating an illegal matka (gambling) racket on 04.08.2025 in a public place, collecting money from the public by writing numbers and making false promises of returns. The case was taken cognizance by the court, and during the hearing on 06.03.2026, the charges were read and explained to the accused, with questions posed regarding his plea. The order documents the accused's response to the charges but does not explicitly state a final judgment on bail or conviction at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts