P.I.TARIKERE P.S. vs MAHAMAD GOWS — 385/2025

Case under Karnataka Police Act 1963 Section 78(3),of,KP,Act. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM700009412025

A.D.R.

Next Hearing

14th March 2026

e-Filing Number

27-10-2025

Filing Number

386/2025

Filing Date

27-10-2025

Registration No

385/2025

Registration Date

27-10-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE

Judge

226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Police Act 1963 Section 78(3),of,KP,Act

Petitioner(s)

P.I.TARIKERE P.S.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MAHAMAD GOWS

Hearing History

Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE

06-03-2026

A.D.R.

23-01-2026

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

27-10-2025

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Plea

Summary The accused, Mohammad Ghaus (38 years, laborer), was charged under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act for operating an illegal matka (gambling) racket on 04.08.2025 in a public place, collecting money from the public by writing numbers and making false promises of returns. The case was taken cognizance by the court, and during the hearing on 06.03.2026, the charges were read and explained to the accused, with questions posed regarding his plea. The order documents the accused's response to the charges but does not explicitly state a final judgment on bail or conviction at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The accused, Mohammad Ghaus (38 years, laborer), was charged under Section 78(3) of the Karnataka Police Act for operating an illegal matka (gambling) racket on 04.08.2025 in a public place, collecting money from the public by writing numbers and making false promises of returns. The case was taken cognizance by the court, and during the hearing on 06.03.2026, the charges were read and explained to the accused, with questions posed regarding his plea. The order documents the accused's response to the charges but does not explicitly state a final judgment on bail or conviction at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case