Veerabhadrappa.K.B vs Mallappa.B.S — 214/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VII,RULE,1,OF,CPC. Status: Mediation for the Nation. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM700007582025
Filing Number
214/2025
Filing Date
12-Aug-2025
Registration No
214/2025
Registration Date
12-Aug-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Veerabhadrappa.K.B
Adv. K.R HEMANTH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mallappa.B.S
Case History
-
25-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Mediation for the Nation
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
29-Jan-2026
For filing written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
12-Jan-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
17-Nov-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
15-Oct-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by three third-party applicants (B.M. Siddaramamma, Shivakumar, and Geetha) to be impleaded as regular defendants in a partition suit involving ancestral joint family properties. The court found them to be necessary parties with potential birthrights in the ancestral properties and rejected the compromise petition filed by the plaintiffs and the original defendant, directing the plaintiffs to amend and furnish an amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Oct-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
17-Sep-2025
For orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
15-Sep-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
01-Sep-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
30-Aug-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
12-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 214/2025
Summary: The court allowed the application filed by three third-party applicants (B.M. Siddaramamma, Shivakumar, and Geetha) to be impleaded as regular defendants in a partition suit involving ancestral joint family properties. The court found them to be necessary parties with potential birthrights in the ancestral properties and rejected the compromise petition filed by the plaintiffs and the original defendant, directing the plaintiffs to amend and furnish an amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts