Dasappa vs Shekarappa Advocate - N.Lokesh KAR 1582/ — 13/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Sec,54,R/W,Sec,151,ofCPC. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KACM700006792022
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
13/2022
Filing Date
24-05-2022
Registration No
13/2022
Registration Date
24-05-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dasappa
Adv. AA
Respondent(s)
Shekarappa Advocate - N.Lokesh KAR 1582/
Uppariganna
Maheshwarappa(Legal Heir)
Adv. MKT
Hanumakka
Adv. MKT
Kariyamma @ Kala
Adv. TDA
Jayappa P
Adv. ML
Hearing History
Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
For orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 07-02-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 01-12-2025 | SUMMONS | |
| 18-10-2025 | SUMMONS | |
| 01-09-2025 | For orders |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court allowed the application and directed the petitioner to implead Smt. R. Chandramma as respondent No. 8 in the final decree proceedings. The court found that Chandramma, who purchased property (Sy.No.47/1B) through a registered sale deed in 1973, is a necessary party to the partition proceedings since she would suffer irreparable loss if the property is allotted without her knowledge. The petitioner was also directed to amend and furnish the amended petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court allowed the application and directed the petitioner to implead Smt. R. Chandramma as respondent No. 8 in the final decree proceedings. The court found that Chandramma, who purchased property (Sy.No.47/1B) through a registered sale deed in 1973, is a necessary party to the partition proceedings since she would suffer irreparable loss if the property is allotted without her knowledge. The petitioner was also directed to amend and furnish the amended petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts