P.I, Tarikere P.S vs MITHUN Advocate - RS — 391/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 304(A),337,279,338. Status: Appearance Of Accussed. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM700006082022
e-Filing Number
13-04-2022
Filing Number
391/2022
Filing Date
13-Apr-2022
Registration No
391/2022
Registration Date
13-Apr-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.I, Tarikere P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MITHUN Advocate - RS
Case History
-
30-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
23-Jan-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
02-Dec-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
14-Oct-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
05-Aug-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
24-Jun-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
19-May-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
18-Mar-2025
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
11-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary: This is a criminal court order (Case CC 391/2022) from a Senior Civil Judge and Principal District Court in Karnataka, heard on 11-02-2025. The court examined witness testimony regarding allegations related to vehicle seizure and photographs dated 06-02-2021. The witness (PW-11) denied recognizing certain individuals and stated he had no knowledge of the circumstances under which documents were signed or photographs were taken. The court treated the witness as hostile and allowed cross-examination by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2025
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
19-Aug-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
02-Jul-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
02-Jul-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
06-May-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
13-Feb-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
19-Dec-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
19-Dec-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
31-Oct-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
11-Sep-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Sep-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Sep-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Sep-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
07-Aug-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
27-Jun-2023
PleaView PDF
-
27-Jun-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
07-Feb-2023
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
27-Dec-2022
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
18-Oct-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
13-Sep-2022
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
08-Aug-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
06-Jun-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
Senior CIVIL Judge And Jmfc,tarikere
-
13-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 391/2022
Summary: This is a criminal court order (Case CC 391/2022) from a Senior Civil Judge and Principal District Court in Karnataka, heard on 11-02-2025. The court examined witness testimony regarding allegations related to vehicle seizure and photographs dated 06-02-2021. The witness (PW-11) denied recognizing certain individuals and stated he had no knowledge of the circumstances under which documents were signed or photographs were taken. The court treated the witness as hostile and allowed cross-examination by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts