P.I, Tarikere P.S vs MITHUN Advocate - RS — 391/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 304(A),337,279,338. Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM700006082022
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
13-04-2022
Filing Number
391/2022
Filing Date
13-04-2022
Registration No
391/2022
Registration Date
13-04-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.I, Tarikere P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MITHUN Advocate - RS
Hearing History
Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 23-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 02-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 14-10-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 11-08-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a criminal court order (Case CC 391/2022) from a Senior Civil Judge and Principal District Court in Karnataka, heard on 11-02-2025. The court examined witness testimony regarding allegations related to vehicle seizure and photographs dated 06-02-2021. The witness (PW-11) denied recognizing certain individuals and stated he had no knowledge of the circumstances under which documents were signed or photographs were taken. The court treated the witness as hostile and allowed cross-examination by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a criminal court order (Case CC 391/2022) from a Senior Civil Judge and Principal District Court in Karnataka, heard on 11-02-2025. The court examined witness testimony regarding allegations related to vehicle seizure and photographs dated 06-02-2021. The witness (PW-11) denied recognizing certain individuals and stated he had no knowledge of the circumstances under which documents were signed or photographs were taken. The court treated the witness as hostile and allowed cross-examination by the accused's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts