State by Tarikere Police vs A-6 Nethaji — 144/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/s.395ofIPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM700003022015
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
Filing Number
144/2015
Filing Date
08-04-2015
Registration No
144/2015
Registration Date
08-04-2015
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State by Tarikere Police
Respondent(s)
A-6 Nethaji
A-7 Ajju @ Jabbu
A-9 Lokesh @ Loki
A-11 Devi Prasad @ Prasad
A-12 Pradeep @ Chiranjeevi
A-8 Saleem Pasha @ Sallu
Hearing History
Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
HEARING
HEARING
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 17-11-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 28-08-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 25-08-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness examination order in Civil Case No. 144/2015 from the Senior Civil Judge's Court in Turkeere (Kannada). On 19-08-2024, witness H. Manjunath (ASI, age 52) was examined and testified regarding court-ordered proclamations issued on 13-03-2024 to locate respondents at specified addresses. The witness confirmed attempts to locate the respondents between 12:00-3:00 PM at four different locations, posting proclamations at their residence and public places, and obtaining certificates from authorities confirming the respondents' lack of fixed or movable property. The cross-examination by the respondent's counsel regarding Section 299 CrPC was rejected, and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness examination order in Civil Case No. 144/2015 from the Senior Civil Judge's Court in Turkeere (Kannada). On 19-08-2024, witness H. Manjunath (ASI, age 52) was examined and testified regarding court-ordered proclamations issued on 13-03-2024 to locate respondents at specified addresses. The witness confirmed attempts to locate the respondents between 12:00-3:00 PM at four different locations, posting proclamations at their residence and public places, and obtaining certificates from authorities confirming the respondents' lack of fixed or movable property. The cross-examination by the respondent's counsel regarding Section 299 CrPC was rejected, and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts