SHO Tarikere vs Manjunatha @ Kalkere Manja — 34/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 457,380,379,of IPC. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM700001442024
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
Filing Number
34/2024
Filing Date
14-02-2024
Registration No
34/2024
Registration Date
14-02-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) Tarikere
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Manjunatha @ Kalkere Manja
Hearing History
Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 30-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 30-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 23-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
Summary The court examined the accused (Manjunath) under Section 313 CrPC in a burglary case (CC 34/2024). Multiple witness statements established that the accused committed a house theft on 23-25 September 2023, stealing ₹50,000 cash, gold ornaments, silver items, and clothing. Evidence showed the stolen car was recovered with the accused's assistance, and investigation revealed he had committed similar thefts elsewhere. The accused was confronted with witness testimonies and recovered evidence but did not provide substantive counter-arguments, effectively admitting involvement through his responses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court examined the accused (Manjunath) under Section 313 CrPC in a burglary case (CC 34/2024). Multiple witness statements established that the accused committed a house theft on 23-25 September 2023, stealing ₹50,000 cash, gold ornaments, silver items, and clothing. Evidence showed the stolen car was recovered with the accused's assistance, and investigation revealed he had committed similar thefts elsewhere. The accused was confronted with witness testimonies and recovered evidence but did not provide substantive counter-arguments, effectively admitting involvement through his responses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts