Smt.Rekha.B.K vs Smt.Ashwini.S Advocate - K.R.Hemanth Kumar KAR686/ — 8/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VII,R,1,R/W,SEC,26,OF,CPC. Status: For Issues. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM700000252025
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8/2025
Filing Date
07-01-2025
Registration No
8/2025
Registration Date
07-01-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE
Judge
226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Rekha.B.K
Adv. Onkara.K.B, Kadur
Respondent(s)
Smt.Ashwini.S Advocate - K.R.Hemanth Kumar KAR686/
D-2 Shankar Rao
D-3 Smt.Sakku Bai
D-4 Kiran Kumar.S
Hearing History
Judge: 226-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,TARIKERE
For Issues
For orders
Hearing on IA
Hearing on IA
For orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | For Issues | |
| 28-01-2026 | For orders | |
| 18-12-2025 | Hearing on IA | |
| 12-11-2025 | Hearing on IA | |
| 18-09-2025 | For orders |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating properties. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, noting that she could not demonstrate when she received possession of the gifted properties or when she was dispossessed, which is essential for proving a valid gift under the Transfer of Property Act. The court concluded the maintainability of the suit itself was doubtful due to lack of evidence that the gift deed was coupled with possession and accepted during the donor's lifetime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating properties. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, noting that she could not demonstrate when she received possession of the gifted properties or when she was dispossessed, which is essential for proving a valid gift under the Transfer of Property Act. The court concluded the maintainability of the suit itself was doubtful due to lack of evidence that the gift deed was coupled with possession and accepted during the donor's lifetime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts