State by Sringeri Police. vs Gundaiah — 611/2024
Case under Arms Act Section U/sec. 3, 25.. Status: For examination of witnesses. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM600007592024
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
07-12-2024
Filing Number
611/2024
Filing Date
10-12-2024
Registration No
611/2024
Registration Date
10-12-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI
Judge
225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
FIR Details
FIR Number
0025
Police Station
SRINGERI PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State by Sringeri Police.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Gundaiah
Poornesh
Hearing History
Judge: 225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
For examination of witnesses
For examination of witnesses
For examination of witnesses
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | For examination of witnesses | |
| 07-03-2026 | For examination of witnesses | |
| 06-02-2026 | For examination of witnesses | |
| 09-01-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA | |
| 11-12-2025 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness examination (PW-03) in Civil Case No. 611/2024 from the Civil Judge & JMFC, Sringeri. The witness, a 60-year-old police officer, testified about the recovery of two unlicensed SBML firearms, ammunition (bullets, cartridges, caps), and gunpowder from two accused persons on 16.04.2024. The defense counsel cross-examined the witness, raising several discrepancies including missing documentation, inconsistencies in the seizure procedure, and questions about the chain of custody of the recovered materials. No re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Charge
Charge
Summary This is a witness examination (PW-03) in Civil Case No. 611/2024 from the Civil Judge & JMFC, Sringeri. The witness, a 60-year-old police officer, testified about the recovery of two unlicensed SBML firearms, ammunition (bullets, cartridges, caps), and gunpowder from two accused persons on 16.04.2024. The defense counsel cross-examined the witness, raising several discrepancies including missing documentation, inconsistencies in the seizure procedure, and questions about the chain of custody of the recovered materials. No re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts