Smt. Roopa V.M vs Chethan G — 33/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.,144.,(1).. Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACM600006252024
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
33/2024
Filing Date
01-10-2024
Registration No
33/2024
Registration Date
01-10-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI
Judge
225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Roopa V.M
Adv. S.G.Shashibhushan
Kum. Tanvija Mendon, Minor Reptd. by her Guardian Mother- Smt. Roopa V M.
Respondent(s)
Chethan G
Hearing History
Judge: 225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
For Steps
For Steps
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | For Steps | |
| 27-02-2026 | For Steps | |
| 17-01-2026 | NOTICE | |
| 26-12-2025 | NOTICE | |
| 06-11-2025 | NOTICE |
Interim Orders
Summary The Court of Civil Judge and J.M.F.C at Sringeri granted an ex-parte interim maintenance order on October 3, 2024, directing the Respondent (a Police Constable earning Rs. 60,000/month) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month to Petitioner No. 2 (the minor daughter) for her maintenance. The court reduced the requested amount of Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 5,000 after finding a prima-facie case that the Respondent had willfully neglected his maintenance obligations despite having sufficient means, while the Petitioner No. 1 (earning Rs. 24,000/month) had insufficient income to support herself and the minor child. The order is subject to modification or cancellation after the Respondent is heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Court of Civil Judge and J.M.F.C at Sringeri granted an ex-parte interim maintenance order on October 3, 2024, directing the Respondent (a Police Constable earning Rs. 60,000/month) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month to Petitioner No. 2 (the minor daughter) for her maintenance. The court reduced the requested amount of Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 5,000 after finding a prima-facie case that the Respondent had willfully neglected his maintenance obligations despite having sufficient means, while the Petitioner No. 1 (earning Rs. 24,000/month) had insufficient income to support herself and the minor child. The order is subject to modification or cancellation after the Respondent is heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts