Smt. Roopa V.M vs Chethan G — 33/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.,144.,(1).. Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KACM600006252024

For Steps

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

33/2024

Filing Date

01-10-2024

Registration No

33/2024

Registration Date

01-10-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI

Judge

225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.,144.,(1).

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Roopa V.M

Adv. S.G.Shashibhushan

Kum. Tanvija Mendon, Minor Reptd. by her Guardian Mother- Smt. Roopa V M.

Respondent(s)

Chethan G

Hearing History

Judge: 225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri

07-03-2026

For Steps

27-02-2026

For Steps

17-01-2026

NOTICE

26-12-2025

NOTICE

06-11-2025

NOTICE

Interim Orders

03-10-2024
Orders

Summary The Court of Civil Judge and J.M.F.C at Sringeri granted an ex-parte interim maintenance order on October 3, 2024, directing the Respondent (a Police Constable earning Rs. 60,000/month) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month to Petitioner No. 2 (the minor daughter) for her maintenance. The court reduced the requested amount of Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 5,000 after finding a prima-facie case that the Respondent had willfully neglected his maintenance obligations despite having sufficient means, while the Petitioner No. 1 (earning Rs. 24,000/month) had insufficient income to support herself and the minor child. The order is subject to modification or cancellation after the Respondent is heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Court of Civil Judge and J.M.F.C at Sringeri granted an ex-parte interim maintenance order on October 3, 2024, directing the Respondent (a Police Constable earning Rs. 60,000/month) to pay Rs. 5,000 per month to Petitioner No. 2 (the minor daughter) for her maintenance. The court reduced the requested amount of Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 5,000 after finding a prima-facie case that the Respondent had willfully neglected his maintenance obligations despite having sufficient means, while the Petitioner No. 1 (earning Rs. 24,000/month) had insufficient income to support herself and the minor child. The order is subject to modification or cancellation after the Respondent is heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case