H S Narayana Bhatta vs H M Hiriyannappa — 42/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U,O,7rule,1ofCPC. Status: For filing written Statement. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACM600006232022

For filing written Statement

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

42/2022

Filing Date

02-11-2022

Registration No

42/2022

Registration Date

02-11-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI

Judge

225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U,O,7rule,1ofCPC

Petitioner(s)

H S Narayana Bhatta

Adv. H G Vamadeva

Respondent(s)

H M Hiriyannappa

Hearing History

Judge: 225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri

07-03-2026

For filing written Statement

23-02-2026

For filing written Statement

08-01-2026

For filing written Statement

18-12-2025

ORDERS

11-12-2025

HEARING

Interim Orders

20-03-2023
Issue
27-06-2023
Deposition
21-09-2024
Deposition
25-10-2024
Deposition
08-01-2026
Orders

Summary: The Court of Civil Judge & JMFC, Sringeri allowed the defendant's application (I.A.No. V) to amend his written statement by adding paragraph 6(A), which raises the defense of res judicata based on an earlier round of litigation between the parties. The amendment was permitted subject to the defendant paying costs of Rs. 300 to the plaintiff, as the court found the proposed amendment necessary for just determination of the dispute and did not cause irreparable prejudice to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of Civil Judge & JMFC, Sringeri allowed the defendant's application (I.A.No. V) to amend his written statement by adding paragraph 6(A), which raises the defense of res judicata based on an earlier round of litigation between the parties. The amendment was permitted subject to the defendant paying costs of Rs. 300 to the plaintiff, as the court found the proposed amendment necessary for just determination of the dispute and did not cause irreparable prejudice to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case