Smt. Neha G.S vs Sunil K.V — 36/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec. 144. Status: For balance. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACM600004532025
Filing Number
36/2025
Filing Date
11-Sep-2025
Registration No
36/2025
Registration Date
11-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI
Judge
225-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Neha G.S
Adv. H.R.Umesha
-
2.Sarin.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunil K.V
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
For balance
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
13-Feb-2026
Awaiting Report
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
29-Nov-2025
Awaiting Report
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
22-Nov-2025
Objection
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
13-Nov-2025
Objection
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
06-Nov-2025
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
29-Oct-2025
Objection
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
08-Oct-2025
Objection
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
19-Sep-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: Interim maintenance petition allowed. The court directed the respondent to pay Rs. 2,500 per month to each petitioner (wife and son) from the date of the order, pending final disposal of the application. The court held that a father is legally bound to maintain his wife and children irrespective of his financial status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Sep-2025
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
18-Sep-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
17-Sep-2025
First Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Sringeri
-
11-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2025
Summary: Interim maintenance petition allowed. The court directed the respondent to pay Rs. 2,500 per month to each petitioner (wife and son) from the date of the order, pending final disposal of the application. The court held that a father is legally bound to maintain his wife and children irrespective of his financial status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts