State by Sringeri Police vs Amith S N — 276/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/Sec.,106(1),281,of,BNS. Status: For examination of witnesses. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM600003902025
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
13-08-2025
Filing Number
276/2025
Filing Date
13-08-2025
Registration No
276/2025
Registration Date
13-08-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI
Judge
225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
FIR Details
FIR Number
0047
Police Station
SRINGERI PS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State by Sringeri Police
Respondent(s)
Amith S N
Hearing History
Judge: 225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
For examination of witnesses
For examination of witnesses
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
For examination of witnesses
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | For examination of witnesses | |
| 19-02-2026 | For examination of witnesses | |
| 05-02-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 18-12-2025 | For examination of witnesses |
Interim Orders
Case Summary This is a witness examination (PW-03) in Civil Case No. 276/2025 before the Civil Judge & J.M.F.C, Sringeri, relating to a road accident that occurred on 23-06-2025. The witness (Mustaq, age 25, a driver) testified on 05-02-2026, identifying police documents including the panchnama (site inspection report), photographs, and the deceased's sandal as evidence. During cross-examination, the witness admitted to being a panch (witness) to the site inspection and acknowledged signing the panchnama, though he later claimed to have given false testimony in court to favor his relatives who were also panchs in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary This is a witness examination (PW-03) in Civil Case No. 276/2025 before the Civil Judge & J.M.F.C, Sringeri, relating to a road accident that occurred on 23-06-2025. The witness (Mustaq, age 25, a driver) testified on 05-02-2026, identifying police documents including the panchnama (site inspection report), photographs, and the deceased's sandal as evidence. During cross-examination, the witness admitted to being a panch (witness) to the site inspection and acknowledged signing the panchnama, though he later claimed to have given false testimony in court to favor his relatives who were also panchs in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts